|
TEXT/POWERPOINT LECTURE |
COURSE :Introduction To LiteratureDEPARTMENT : ENGLISHPROFESSOR : OLMSTEDLecture6 : Poetry_Lines_Person_Irony
View the Power Point Presentation of the Lecture
Is it on? Hi today we’re looking at three things how to read poems
out loud, how to identify the persona of a poem, and how to interpret
irony. When you read a poem out loud your voice can influence meaning
just as line breaks or punctuation do. Poems should be read more slowly
than you’d read a newspaper article for instance with attention
to pauses and emphasis. Some poets change their voices when they read
maybe chanting if that’s appropriate the way William Butler Yeats
does in “The Lake Isle of Innisfree” or rhythmically the way
Gwendolyn Brooks does in “We Real Cool.” First I want to show
you an example of an Emily Dickinson poem the way she intended it to look
and the way an early editor quote on quote fixed her poem for her to make
it correct. You’ll need to go to course documents to see a copy
of this as well as fact simile of her original manuscript for another
poem which is sometimes called “Sacred Closet.” Dickinson
didn’t title her poems when they were collected after she died each
was given a number there were over 1700. She used dashes to indicate a
pause though in her handwritten manuscripts of course they didn’t
have tag writers back then or maybe they did but she didn’t use
one some of her dashes were longer, some were more short, some of her
dashes were even vertical as though they were approximating a musical
mark. Things get really interesting when you look at “Sacred Closet”
The manuscript of the poem shows the closing words running along the side
and even upside down at the top of the page which means you have to turn
the page to read it. Even E.E. Cummings didn’t do that. Okay now
we’ll look at the poems oops. Yeah I did that right, didn’t
I? On the left you see hold on a second we’ll get it placed on the
left you see Higginson’s edited version and on the right the original
as she intended it we’re as close as we can get to her initial her
original manuscript. What differences do you notice right away? Well first
of all hold on okay first of all you notice let’s see if I if I
push this is that right oh where’s the little hand okay sorry about
that bear with me. First you notice that in this version let’s start
put it over here in this version Higginson has made four stanzas four
quatrains. He standardized the punctuation so you have question marks,
semicolons, commas, he’s eliminated all the dashes that Dickinson
used. He’s changed words in stanzas two he’s used sated instead
of vanquished. In the third stanza he’s used din where is din okay
here we go din instead of ring and there are more. In your activity for
today you can tell me what you think of this. Finally he’s removed
all of Emily Dickinson’s special and eccentric even or individualistic
uses of capitalization. All of these capitals have been removed. We might
say one way to think of this as is that Higginson has tamed Emily Dickinson’s
poem, made it correct and as modern readers we find that offensive. I’ll
read the first half of each to suggest how punctuation can change how
you read a poem and therefore its meaning. “The White Heat”
dare you see a soul at the white heat? Then crouch within the door red
is the fire’s common tint but when the vivid ore has sated flame’s
conditions its quivering substance plays without a color, but the light
of unannointed blaze. That was Higginson’s poem now we look at Dickinson’s
version. Dare you see a soul at the white heat. Then crouch within the
door red is the fire’s common tint but when the vivid ore has vanquished
flame’s conditions its quivers from the forge without a color, but
he light of unannointed blaze. I’ll leave that to you to think about
the differences there. Is it just visual, has he just changed a few punctuation
marks or has the experience of reading the poem changed as well. One of
the most obvious examples of the change is her use of the word red which
is set apart here by a dash from the previous line and a dash after, so
there’s an emphasis on that word a pause before and after that’s
missing over here in this one. I’d like to introduce you to two
terms enjambement and end-stop. Enjambement is the breaking of a phrase,
clause or sentence by the end of a line or between two verses. When the
units of sense in a passage of poetry don’t coincide with the verses,
such as in these lines from Langston Hughes’s poem then you have
enjambement. it’s not easy to know what is true for you or me at
age twenty-two, my age. But I guess I’m what I feel and see and
hear Harlem I hear you, hear me we two you, me, talk on this page. Enjambement
occurs here when the line is not finished it would sound wrong and awkward
if you read it this way it’s not easy to know what is true for you
or me at twenty-two, my age. There’s a break there that you don’t
want to emphasize by pausing. End-stop on the other hand occurs when a
phrase, clause, or sentence is marked by the end of a line of poetry with
a mark of punctuation that is conventional. Aunt Jemima’s tigers
prance across a screen, because that’s exactly where you would put
it in a conventional sentence. Bright topaz denizens of a world of green
so end-stopping and enjambement are two key terms that you need to be
aware and that impact how you read a poem. Let’s look at two poems
and think about the way that enjambement and end-stops work. The first
one is Edward Arlington Robinson’s “Luke Havergal” and
the second is Langston Hughes’ “Theme For English B”
both are in your book. While I read pay a special attention to the punctuation
dashes especially and whether the sense of excuse me whether the sense
of a line ends at the end of the line or if it continues onto the next
line. “Luke Havergal” Go the western gate, Luke Havergal there
where the lines the vines cling crimson the wall and in the twilight wait
for what will come. The wind will moan, the leaves will whisper some,
whisper of her and strike you as they fall. But go and if you trust her
she will call. Go the western gate Luke Havergal—Luke Havergal.
No, there is not a dawn in eastern skies to rift the fiery night that’s
in your eyes but there, where western glooms are gathering the dark will
end the dark, if anything. God slays Himself with every leaf that flies
and hell is more than half of paradise. No, there is not a dawn in eastern
skies—in eastern skies. Out of a grave as I come to tell you this,
out of a grave I come to quench the kiss that flames upon your forehead
with a glow that blinds you to the way that you must go. Yes, there is
yet one way to where she is bitter but one that faith can never miss.
Out of a grave I come to tell you this—to tell you this. There is
the western gate, Luke Havergal. There are the crimson leaves upon the
wall. Go, for the winds are tearing them away or think to riddle the dead
words they say nor any more to feel them as they fall but go and if you
trust her she will call. There is the western gate, Luke Havergal-- Luke
Havergal. Dickinson uses dashes to indicate pauses in emphasis why does
Robinson use them? Notice they appear only four times at the end of each
stanza excuse me at the end of each stanza before the repeated words as
I read the function of the dash here it seems to set up an echo. You might
think about that when you answer the question about this poem in the activity
for today. This poem employs end-stop lines as well as a few that are
enjambed. Here’s an example of enjambed lines. There is not a dawn
in eastern skies to rift the fiery night. You wouldn’t read that
there is not a dawn in eastern skies to rift the fiery night as if you
were starting a new sentence so pay attention to the way whether it’s
enjambement or whether the end of the line represents the end of a thought.
Let’s see okay the next poem is Langston Hughes’ “Theme
for English B”. Three points I’d like to make about my reading
of this poem. First, the instructor’s assignment should probably
be read in a slightly more formal voice than the rest of the poem. That’s
right here oh hold on. Okay alright second while most of the lines do
conclude with punctuation several do not. These are examples of enjambement
when you read in an enjambed line you read with a sense of the lines there
is no artificial pause at the end of such a line. Finally Hughes also
uses dashes. I think the dashes indicate a pause as they do in Dickinson’s
poetry as well as emphasis but they also set off an interruption in the
flow of thought. This is how dashes function in prose you use a dash to
interrupt the sense of a sentence that you’re saying. Maybe you
have some more thoughts on how the dashes work. So here especially interesting
I think are these kinds of dashes here where he asks a question he says
Harlem I hear you hear you hear me we too you me talk on this page. I
hear New York too me who. So by using these dashes he interrupts himself
and you get the sense that he’s thinking out loud as he’s
struggling to write this assignment this paper that is going to explain
who he is a black man to a white teacher and these are these cause him
to reflect deeply about the meaning of who he is and I think the dashes
help him do that. Okay in the activities for today I asked you to respond
to the idea of person or persona in these poems. Persona as you read in
your textbook refers to the character or voice that the poet adopts. Many
poems are written from the point of view of the poet but often the poet
adopts another person’s voice. Think of Gwendolyn Brooks “We
Real Cool” poem for instance it’s almost certain that she
herself is not one of the we “We Real Cool.” In “Luke
Havergal” the same is true for Robinson whereas in Hughes’
poem not just this one but all the ones for today it’s more likely
that the I in the poem is actually Hughes or a version of Hughes maybe
a younger one. All of us are made up of many different selves for instance
but my voice and my concerns, my sense of humor or tone or even the words
I use are different when I’m being a teacher or a mother or a wife
or a friend if I’m talking to people who have power over me or if
I’m talking to people who maybe I have a certain amount of power
over them. What’s self do you think appears in Hughes’ poem?
Think about that in your response today. So far we’ve talked about
how to read poems and I’ve elaborated on the text discussion of
the person in the poem, now I’d like to say a few words about irony.
This is a crucial element of language and communication. Jokes for instance
often rely on irony. Here’s one a disgruntled postal worker sent
a letter bomb to his boss but he didn’t pay enough for the postage
for it to reach its destination. So it came back return to sender and
you guessed it he didn’t recognize his own handwriting so he opened
it and blew himself up. This sounds a little bit like poetic justice which
is another kind of irony. Usually when someone gets what they deserve.
Some of you may be Stephen King fans if so maybe you’ve read Survivor
Type in it a doctor with no morals or conscience is shipwrecked on a deserted
island. Because of his elicit activities he has a valise of heroin with
him when he breaks his ankle he uses the heroin for an anesthetic then
cuts his own foot off and eats it. He continues to cut off body parts
to fend off starvation finally cutting off his left hand. The diary that
he keeps ends there obviously he’s dead. It is poetic justice that
the means and skills he used in a lifetime of harming others become the
instrument of suffering and indeed death that he inflicts upon himself.
That is what you call irony. There are four types of irony that our book
discusses and in the second activity for today I ask you to identify what
type of irony is at work in four different poems. I don’t want to
spoil your fun so I’ll just summarize again what the four types
are in my own words. Basically in irony there’s a contrast or a
disjuncture between what’s said or what’s known.
|